Why is a consensual relationship between CRSS professionals and the individuals they serve considered impossible?

A consensual relationship between CRSS professionals and the individuals they serve is considered impossible primarily because of the inherent power imbalance in the relationship. CRSS professionals are in a position of authority and support, which can significantly affect the ability of the individuals they serve to give genuine consent. When one party holds more power—due to their position, knowledge, or resources—the ability for the other party to freely and fully agree to a relationship can be compromised. This dynamic makes it challenging to ensure that any relationship is based on mutual consent rather than influenced by the professional's position.

While boundaries in professional relationships are essential for maintaining ethics and professionalism, the key issue in this context is the power imbalance that undermines genuine consent. Such imbalances can lead to situations where the individual feels pressured to engage in a relationship, which is why the consensus in the field is to avoid personal relationships between CRSS professionals and those they assist. Professional ethics and best practices prioritize the well-being and autonomy of individuals, reinforcing the importance of maintaining clear boundaries in the helping relationship.