What should be evaluated when considering the options in ethical decision-making?

In ethical decision-making, it is crucial to evaluate both the possible positive and negative consequences for each plan since this holistic approach helps to assess the potential impact of the decisions on all stakeholders involved. This evaluation encourages a balanced consideration of outcomes, ensuring that decisions are made with a comprehensive understanding of their implications.

By analyzing the various consequences, individuals can foresee how a particular action may help or hinder not just the individual making the decision but also others who are affected by it. This practice aligns with ethical principles that emphasize the importance of non-maleficence (avoiding harm) and beneficence (promoting good), which are central to responsible decision-making in recovery support.

Other options focus too narrowly on specific factors without considering the broader implications that multiple perspectives can bring. Relying solely on cost-benefit analysis overlooks the ethical dimensions of potential impacts. Focusing exclusively on personal preferences or time constraints can lead to decisions that may not align with ethical standards, as these factors often fail to encompass the wider consequences of a decision. Therefore, evaluating the possible positive and negative consequences provides a comprehensive framework for ethical decision-making.