What could be a negative consequence of attempting to influence another person's Advance Directive?

The assertion that attempting to influence another person's Advance Directive may lead to it becoming less empowering is valid because an Advance Directive is intended to reflect the individual's wishes regarding their medical treatment and care preferences. When someone tries to impose their own opinions or desires on another person's Advance Directive, it undermines the very purpose of the document, which is to empower individuals to make their own choices about their future health care.

If others influence the Advance Directive, it might no longer authentically represent the individual's true values, beliefs, and choices. This loss of authenticity can lead individuals to feel disempowered and less in control of their health decisions. They may feel pressured to conform to the wishes of others rather than expressing their own, which can hinder the effectiveness of the directive when it is needed.

The other options do not align as closely with the implications of influencing someone's Advance Directive. Legal complications can arise in some contexts, but they are not always a direct result of influence—rather, they stem from how the directive is executed or contested. Enhancing communication might seem like a benefit, but this is only true if the conversation respects the individual's autonomy. Similarly, better care decisions depend on accurate representation of the individual’s wishes, which is compromised when influence is exerted